There are Adobe test pages for each so you want to make sure that AFP succeeds and the other ASP fails to play. If this is accurate can someone get Firefox to name things correctly, AND if article is accurate let this be a warning to others that they NOT use ASP, but as needed rely on AFP. First, see if you have Acrobat Reader installed and working properly by reading this PDF. If the alpha value were 100, the mask would be completely transparent. In this video, we learn how to test Adobe Flash, Shockwave, Acrobat & Java. Because the mask graphic has an alpha value of 50, the mask is semi-transparent. My Firefox is working, but this confusion of calling things by their proper (or at least a unique name) seems crazy to me. When you test the Flash document (Control > Test Movie), the mask graphic now reveals the part of the flower image that appears beneath it and masks the rest of the image. If you see no graphic or a broken image, click on the button below to go to the Macromedia Shockwave Installation web site. Mozilla Firefox users should note that the presence of the “Shockwave Flash” plugin listed in the Firefox Add-ons section denotes an installation of Adobe Flash Player plugin - not Adobe Shockwave Player. Shockwave Test If you see a graphic above saying that Shockwave is properly installed, then you can continue on to the next test. According to this security alert web article ASP is far less secure than AFP which itself isn't great.
Adobe various websites and now seemingly Firefox seem to continually confuse and obscure things regarding the two different Adobe Players (Adobe Flash Player AFP and Adobe Shockwave Player ASP).
0 kommentar(er)
